First to introduce 4K textures, then 8K — texturing is their main focus. Exceptional for organic subjects like faces where textures can look truly amazing. Less consistent on hard-surface models. Can be outstanding for specific use cases, but also the most expensive option on the market.
Model Versions (2)
Arena Rank
#7
Overall ELO
1000
Geometry ELO
1000
Win Rate
—
Arena Votes
Total: 0 votes
Average Generation Cost
$1.50
Typical runtime: 6.7 min
Curated from neighboring ranks
#6 · 1000 ELO
YVO3D 2.0 is ranked #7 (1000 ELO) while TRELLIS.2 currently sits at #6 (1000 ELO).
YVO3D 2.0 maintains a 0 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
YVO3D 2.0 wins about — of its judged matches overall, compared to — for TRELLIS.2.
TRELLIS.2 often returns meshes quicker (1.0 min) while YVO3D 2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#8 · 1000 ELO
YVO3D 2.0 is ranked #7 (1000 ELO) while YVO3D 2.5 currently sits at #8 (1000 ELO).
YVO3D 2.0 maintains a 0 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
YVO3D 2.0 wins about — of its judged matches overall, compared to — for YVO3D 2.5.
#5 · 1000 ELO
YVO3D 2.0 is ranked #7 (1000 ELO) while Rodin Gen 2.5 (Preview) currently sits at #5 (1000 ELO).
YVO3D 2.0 maintains a 0 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
YVO3D 2.0 wins about — of its judged matches overall, compared to — for Rodin Gen 2.5 (Preview).
Rodin Gen 2.5 (Preview) often returns meshes quicker (1.0 min) while YVO3D 2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#9 · 1000 ELO
YVO3D 2.0 is ranked #7 (1000 ELO) while Tripo AI v3.1 currently sits at #9 (1000 ELO).
YVO3D 2.0 maintains a 0 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
YVO3D 2.0 wins about — of its judged matches overall, compared to — for Tripo AI v3.1.
Tripo AI v3.1 often returns meshes quicker (2.7 min) while YVO3D 2.0 focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for YVO3D 2.0?
YVO3D 2.0 is sitting at #7 with an arena ELO of 1000. It has participated in 0 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with YVO3D 2.0?
YVO3D 2.0 reports an average generation cost of $1.50 per test with a typical runtime of 6.7 min.
When should I choose YVO3D 2.0 over TRELLIS.2?
YVO3D 2.0 is ranked #7 (1000 ELO) while TRELLIS.2 currently sits at #6 (1000 ELO). YVO3D 2.0 maintains a 0 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes. YVO3D 2.0 wins about — of its judged matches overall, compared to — for TRELLIS.2. TRELLIS.2 often returns meshes quicker (1.0 min) while YVO3D 2.0 focuses on fidelity.
Follow YVO3D on X (Twitter) for the latest news, updates, and announcements.
Follow @YVOVY_AI
